Real Estate · Property Access · Easements
Landlocked Property in Pennsylvania: Access Rights, Easement by Necessity, and What to Do When There Is No Road
A landlocked property in Pennsylvania has no legal access to a public road. Without a recorded easement or a court-established right of access, the property cannot be developed, financed, or in some cases lawfully occupied. Lenders will not close on a mortgage. Building permits will not issue. The problem surfaces at closing, at refinance, or when a permit application triggers a title review — and at that point, the window to fix it before money changes hands is already closing.
Pennsylvania law provides several routes to establish access for a landlocked parcel: easement by necessity, easement by implication, prescriptive easement after 21 years of open use, and a statutory private road proceeding under the Private Road Act at 36 P.S. Section 2731. Each route has different requirements, different timelines, and different costs. Which one applies depends on the chain of title, the physical configuration of the property, and how the landlocked condition was created.
A landlocked parcel with no recorded access easement cannot be financed, permitted, or developed until the access problem is resolved. The time to identify and fix this is before closing — not after.
Call 412-351-4422 or schedule a consultation to discuss your property access issue.
How a Property Becomes Landlocked in Pennsylvania
Most landlocked parcels in Pennsylvania were not always landlocked. The condition is almost always created by a prior conveyance that severed access without recording an easement to replace it.
The most common pattern in Western Pennsylvania: a large parcel is subdivided in the 1920s, 1940s, or 1950s. The original owner sells off the front lots fronting the road and retains the rear parcels. The plan of lots shows the rear parcel as a numbered lot with an access notation — “access via Lot 12” or “subject to right of way” — but no easement is ever recorded in the chain of title. Decades pass. The original owner dies. The rear parcel changes hands several times through estates and private sales. Nobody pulls the original plan of lots until a buyer applies for a mortgage or a permit and the title examiner flags the access problem. By then the front lot has been sold to a third party who owes nothing to anyone.
Easement by Necessity in Pennsylvania
Easement by necessity is the primary legal remedy for a landlocked parcel. Pennsylvania courts will imply an easement of access when three conditions are met: the dominant and servient parcels were once under common ownership, the parcels were severed by a conveyance, and access to a public road is strictly necessary — not merely convenient — as a result of that severance.
Strict necessity means the property has no other legal access to a public road. A property that can reach a road through another route, even an inconvenient or expensive one, may not qualify. Pennsylvania courts have applied the strict necessity standard consistently. The necessity must exist at the time of severance, not arise from later development or changed conditions.
Establishing easement by necessity requires tracing the chain of title back to the common ownership event, demonstrating that no other access exists, and identifying the specific location of the easement across the servient parcel. That location is either agreed upon by the parties or determined by the court. The court has discretion to locate the easement where it is least burdensome to the servient estate while still providing adequate access to the landlocked parcel.
The Pennsylvania Private Road Act
When easement by necessity cannot be established through the chain of title, Pennsylvania’s Private Road Act provides a statutory alternative. Under 36 P.S. Section 2731 et seq., a landowner whose property is without access to a public road may petition the Court of Common Pleas to open a private road across an adjoining parcel.
The Private Road Act proceeding is distinct from easement by necessity. It does not require common ownership in the chain of title. It applies when a parcel is genuinely landlocked and no private remedy is available. The court appoints a jury of view to examine the premises, determine whether a private road is necessary, identify the route, and assess damages to the owner of the land over which the road will pass. The petitioner pays those damages.
The process is slower and more expensive than a negotiated easement agreement. A Private Road Act proceeding in Allegheny County typically takes six to eighteen months from petition to final order. It is the remedy of last resort when the neighboring landowner refuses to grant access voluntarily and no implied easement can be established.
What Happens at Closing When Access Is Not Established
A mortgage lender will not close on a landlocked parcel. Title insurance underwriters require marketable title, and a parcel with no recorded access easement does not have marketable title. The title commitment will contain an exception for the access problem, the lender will object, and the closing will be delayed or terminated until the issue is resolved.
The options at that point depend on timing. If the problem surfaces before closing, the buyer can demand that the seller cure the title defect as a condition of closing, negotiate a price reduction that accounts for the cost of establishing access, or terminate the agreement of sale and recover the deposit. Pennsylvania’s standard agreement of sale requires marketable title. A landlocked parcel without recorded access does not have marketable title, and a buyer who terminates on that basis is entitled to the return of the deposit.
If the problem surfaces after closing — because the buyer waived the title contingency, accepted a quitclaim deed, or purchased at a tax sale — the options are more limited. The buyer owns the problem. The remedies are a quiet title action to establish the implied easement, a Private Road Act petition, or a claim against the title insurer if title insurance was purchased and the policy covers the access defect.
A buyer contracted to purchase a residential lot in a Wexford subdivision. The plan of lots, recorded in 1952, showed the lot as having access “via the adjoining parcel to the north.” No easement had ever been recorded. Three days before closing the title company flagged the issue. The lender would not close. The seller’s position was that access had always been understood and the neighbors had no objection. Understanding and no objection are not a recorded easement. The buyer invoked the marketable title clause in the agreement of sale and demanded either a recorded easement agreement from the neighboring parcel owner or termination with full deposit return. The seller had thirty days. On day twenty-eight, with a recorded easement agreement in hand, the closing proceeded. The buyer paid nothing extra. The seller absorbed the cost of obtaining the easement. The outcome depended entirely on the buyer having counsel who identified the leverage before the closing deadline passed.
Prescriptive Easement as an Access Remedy
If a property has been accessed across a neighboring parcel openly, continuously, and without the neighbor’s permission for 21 years, a prescriptive easement may have been established under Pennsylvania law. The 21-year period mirrors the adverse possession statute. The use must be actual, open, notorious, continuous, and hostile — meaning without the permission of the landowner.
Prescriptive easement is a difficult remedy for a landlocked parcel because it requires proving historical use over two decades, which may be impossible if the parcel has been vacant or the prior owners are deceased. It is more useful as a defensive argument — when the owner of the servient parcel tries to block access that has been used for decades — than as an affirmative remedy for a buyer discovering the problem at closing.
Western Pennsylvania Title Issues: Old Subdivision Plans and Missing Easements
Allegheny County parcels subdivided before 1960 often have plan notations that are not recorded easements, requiring chain-of-title analysis to establish implied access rights. Pittsburgh hillside properties from the same era frequently contain ambiguous drainage, retaining wall, and slope access obligations that modern title searches do not uncover. Title searches in Allegheny County for rear-lot and interior parcels should always include a review of the original plan of lots and the deeds from the original common owner. An access problem buried in a 1940s subdivision is not visible from a standard thirty-year title search. It requires going back to the root of title.
Resolving a Landlocked Property Problem Before It Becomes Litigation
Most landlocked property disputes resolve without court proceedings when the parties understand their positions clearly. The owner of the servient parcel — the lot the access must cross — often does not know the history of the subdivision, does not want litigation, and will agree to a recorded easement agreement if approached correctly and compensated fairly.
A negotiated easement agreement, drafted and recorded before closing, resolves the title problem permanently and at far lower cost than a Private Road Act proceeding or quiet title action. The agreement specifies the location of the easement, the width, the permitted uses, maintenance obligations, and any compensation paid to the servient parcel owner. Once recorded at the Allegheny County Recorder of Deeds, it runs with the land and binds all future owners of both parcels. The same negotiation approach applies to boundary disputes when neighbors disagree about where the property line should be.
The alternative — proceeding to court — adds months and significant cost. A Private Road Act petition in Allegheny County involves filing fees, jury of view costs, survey costs, and the damages assessed to compensate the servient parcel owner. Those damages are paid by the petitioner. Negotiating before filing almost always produces a better outcome for both sides.
Frequently Asked Questions: Landlocked Property in Pennsylvania
What is a landlocked property in Pennsylvania?
A landlocked property has no legal access to a public road. It is surrounded by parcels owned by others with no recorded easement, deeded right of way, or statutory access providing a legal route to a public street or highway.
Can I be forced to give access to a landlocked neighbor in Pennsylvania?
Potentially yes. If the landlocked parcel was severed from a parcel that once included your property, a court may imply an easement by necessity across your land. Under the Private Road Act, a court can order a private road across your property with compensation. Pennsylvania law does not allow a landlocked parcel to remain permanently inaccessible when a legal remedy exists.
Does a plan of lots notation create an easement in Pennsylvania?
Not automatically. A notation on a recorded plan of lots referencing access “via adjoining parcel” or a marked right of way may support an implied easement argument, but it is not a recorded easement. Whether it creates enforceable access rights depends on the language, the chain of title, and whether the circumstances support an implied easement at the time of severance.
What is the Private Road Act in Pennsylvania?
The Private Road Act at 36 P.S. Section 2731 allows a landlocked landowner to petition the Court of Common Pleas to establish a private road across a neighboring parcel when no other access exists. The court appoints a jury of view to determine the route and assess damages. The petitioner pays those damages to the servient parcel owner.
Can I get a mortgage on a landlocked property in Pennsylvania?
Not without recorded legal access. Lenders require marketable title, and a parcel with no recorded easement or legal right of way does not have marketable title. The access problem must be resolved and a recorded easement or court order must be in place before a lender will close.
What if I already closed on a landlocked property?
Your options depend on how title was conveyed and whether you purchased title insurance. If you have title insurance and the policy does not except the access issue, you may have a claim. If you accepted a quitclaim deed or waived the title contingency, a quiet title action to establish an implied easement or a Private Road Act petition are the primary remedies. A claim against the seller for failure to disclose a known title defect may also be available depending on the circumstances.
Lebovitz & Lebovitz, P.A. · Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, near the Parkway East. Real estate matters throughout Allegheny County and Western Pennsylvania since 1933.
This page is part of our Real Estate Issues practice. For general easement law in Pennsylvania see easements in Pennsylvania. For neighbor access disputes and blocked easements see neighbor blocked easement access. For shared driveway disputes see common driveway easements in Pennsylvania. For post-closing easement discovery see found easement after closing in Pennsylvania.

